Hudud is unsuitable for Malaysia and those who discuss it are fools, former de facto law minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said today, becoming the first Umno minister to openly dismiss the implementation of the Islamic penal code in Kelantan.
Nazri, who is now Tourism Minister, said hudud could only be implemented by amending the Federal Constitution and this would require two-thirds of legislators in Parliament to support it.
"No need to discuss something that will not happen. It's stupid for anyone to even be discussing hudud," he told reporters in the Parliament lobby today.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/only-fools-talk-about-hudud-in-malaysia-says-umno-minister#sthash.id5ZHA1m.dpuf.lvbala said,
These are some comments done by the the UMNO minister with regards to HUDUD. He got the point of course. But whether it is practical to practice or to implement is another story chapter. In politics, anything can happen, anything is possible. But the core identification of the exception is base on the rational theory which meant to be practical.
Hudud or not Hudud come base on majority support. It also must be considered in implementing to non Muslim as well. Can a HUDUD applicable to non Muslims?
These are the questions which need to be considered and practiced base on rationalism and humanitarian concept.
It is not that we are against it, because nothing is to be against when something is proven to be good to all. If implementing HUDUD is good for all and benefit for the citizen, it should be welcomed.
Rationalism and humanatarian is a must to practice HUDUD as this law has been practice many manyt years and centuries ago and whether it is suitable or not must be considered. Other countries who practice HUDUD should be exampled and shared.
When all views are considered, than HUDUD should be in place without any excuses.
All comments are good comments. There are no bad comments or good comments. So everyone have the right to comment. How about you?
No comments:
Post a Comment